Policies, players and issues across the region.

Alternative Approaches to Addressing the Risk of Non-Permanence in Afforestation and Reforestation Projects under the Clean Development Mechanism – Summary

November, 2012. .. Prepared based on information from the Duke Study; and The BioCarbon Fund Experience: Insights from Afforestation/Reforestation Clean Development Mechanism Projects. 4 pages

Alternative Approaches to Addressing the Risk of Non-Permanence in Afforestation and Reforestation Projects under the Clean Development Mechanism

November, 2012. Brian C. Murray, Christopher S. Galik, Stephen Mitchell, Phil Cottle. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University. Prepared for The World Bank Carbon Finance Unit (BioCarbon Fund). 72 pages

Accounting for carbon leakage from REDD+ are current quantification methods suitable?

June, 2012. Henders, S. Focali Brief No 2012:01 Gothenburg. 4 pages. ISBN: 978-91-86402-20-4

Addressing Non-Permanence and Reversal Risks of Afforestation and Reforestation (A/R) Activities under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)

May, 2012. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University. Prepared on behalf of the World Bank Carbon Finance Unit (BioCarbon Fund). 4 pages

Forest Carbon leakage quantification methods and their suitability for assessing leakage in REDD

January, 2012. Sabine Henders and Madelene Ostwald. Forests 2012, 3(1), 33-58; doi:10.3390/f3010033